Quick Comments: Bears at Packers 10/11/26

Posted on October 11, 2026 by Tom Shannon

Offense

  • If you are going to talk shit all week like Ben Johnson does, your offense better be ready to play.  They weren’t.  It seems like they never are when it comes to division opponents.  It’s a problem.
  • Tyson Bagent just didn’t look quick out there.  The reads weren’t quick enough.  The decisions weren’t quick enough.  Like last week, everything seemed just a touch late.
  • The Bears struggled to run the ball today and when they can’t do that, they’re going to struggle.  I thought Green Bay won the Lise of scrimmage far too often today.
  • Nice drive at the end of the first half.  It ate up clock and kept the defense off the field and ended in a touchdown.  It felt like it was important at that point just to keep the Bears in the game, especially with Green Bay apparently ending the half with the ball and beginning the second half with it.
  • I thin the Packers were plenty ready for those jet sweeps that Johnson was rolling out there.  Maybe he kept calling them because he was trying to keep the defense honest or something.  But whatever it was, they weren’t getting much yardage.

Defense

  •  I thought the Green Bay offense came out exactly like I thought they would.  They executed pretty well.  They always play their best football agains the Bears.
  • The Packers were really winning the line of scrimmage most of the time.  We heard all week about how weak their offensive line was.  But, as usual, they coached the line and rolled them out and they did the job.  And, as usual, the Bears struggled to take advantage of what was supposed to be an obvious point of weakness.
  • The Bears were blitzing more than usual early in the game.  Usually they build towards that level as the game goes on.  But I thought they brought it more than usual early.  Unfortunately it wasn’t getting to Jordan Love.  He saw zero pressure when it wasn’t an obvious passing situation. 
  • Once Tyreek Stevenson went out, everything went at Malik Muhammed.  They made a lot of hay off of that matchup.

Miscellaneous 

  • Pretty cool Green Bay uniforms today.  Like the shade of green.  It also blends in better with the grass which helps disguise them.  The pale yellow offset it pretty well.  I wonder if they were meant to honor the military.
  • I thought the Bears were slipping around a bit early on.  I wonder if they had the right footwear on.  I think they were also struggling a bit with the sun.  Dillon Thieneman never appeared to see the ball on the Christian Watson touchdown early in the third quarter.
  • Really, the difference in the game was the explosive scoring plays for the Packers.  Well, and, as always, the turnovers.  But other than that, the stats were mostly pretty comparable otherwise most of the way through 3 quarters.
  • The Bears lost this game in part because the Packers just played very well against the Bears, as they always seem to do.  But the Bears also have a problem.  Over 2 seasons under Ben Johnson they have struggled against the division.  When you are playing a last place schedule and are otherwise leading a charmed life, maybe you get away with that.  Against a first place schedule, it’s a problem you’d better solve fast.
Posted in Chicago Bears, Green Bay Packers | Leave a comment

How Referees Are Handling Goal Line Calls and Other Points of View

Posted on October 9, 2026 by Tom Shannon
  • Phil Thompson at the Chicago Tribune on QB Tyson Bagent.  He quotes head coach Ben Johnson after the win:

“Tyson’s earned the right to be our No. 2 quarterback.  I have a lot of confidence in him, thought he played really well today. Efficient with the football. Obviously he had the one pick, left the ball a little bit behind where he’d like to go with it, but other than that, I thought he had a great job with the operation.”

It wasn’t the only ball he left behind a receiver.  And he did have three interceptions that were called back by penalty, though one was an obvious free play where he just took his shot.  

Overall, I’d agree, though.  He had a good afternoon.

Agent was calm in the pocket. Kudos to the offensive line for giving him plenty of time most of the time but when the Jets turned up the heat in the second half and started blitzing, he hung tough in the pocket, avoided the sack and generally delivered good balls under the circumstances.

Bagent spread the ball around to his playmakers in a way that a quarterback without an elite arm or elite mobility needs to do.  He worked through his progressions and used his most valuable asset – his head.

“It just so happened that we gave [Kyle Monangai] the ball 30 times apparently. I didn’t even know until I got in my office at the end. But he ran super, super hard. Roschon [Johnson] came in, ran super hard as well. We really like that room and where they’re at right now. And then, of course, you combine that with our bigs up front and the tight ends, the way that they block, it’s fun to watch them go to work.”

One thing that stuck out to me was the fact that Johnson looked quicker and more explosive than he did during the preseason.

I think that may be very good news for the Bears because I’m not sure that Monangai, who apparently broke his thumb on Sunday, is going to be ready to carry the ball against the Packers this week. They will likely want to give Johnson the ball in the same way that they usually mix it up to give it to Monangai behind Swift.

  • Biggs on the stadium situation. Commissioner Roger Goodell and Gov. J.B. Pritzker along with select lawmakers met this week to discuss the situation:

I don’t know why Warren did not attend the meeting, but his absence along with that of Chairman George McCaskey was notable.

Getting Goodell and Pritzker in the same room was a significant step, and there’s reason to believe actual progress is being made. Crain’s reported there is momentum toward a deal with Arlington Heights in which the team would pay for the construction of the stadium but would then lease use of the stadium.

If that sounds somewhat like the arrangement they currently have at Soldier Field, it should. The Bears figure they can get friendlier terms in Arlington Heights, but they bought that land with the idea of owning their own stadium, right?

As to the first part, I’m not terribly surprised that Warren, at least, wasn’t there.  The day that they hired Warren it seemed to me like he was the wrong guy to handle this.  He was commissioner of the Big Ten when they decided not to play football during the pandemic.  The Big Ten had to reverse the decision after losing hundreds of millions of dollars once the rest of college football proved that it could be safe to play.

The situation was poorly managed.  It is likely that this one has been, too.

I can’t imagine the Bears would shell out billions of dollars to build their own stadium, only to give it to Arlington Heights and lease it from them.  Could they arrange it so that the government owned a part of the stadium so that they get a portion of the profit on their investment?  That I could see.  But the Bears have to own their own stadium.  Anything else would be ridiculous.

I’m thinking about the two touchdowns that were overturned in the Jets game. I was wondering if referees have a tendency to call the touchdown when they’re not sure because they know that scoring plays are automatically reviewed? — Tom S., Chicago

That might be a small factor. It’s probably a more conscious decision for officials on plays involving a fumble. Replay provides a safety net when they don’t want to blow a play dead that is happening bang-bang in real time. They can allow the action to play out, and with an automatic review of all turnovers, the replay can sort it out.

I don’t have a lot to add here except that on the second touchdown I thought the call came very late.  It looked to me like the officials on both sidelines weren’t sure where the ball was.  Finally, one of them raised his arms.

It was an odd sequence.  I’m not sure there was enough evidence to overturn either one of those touchdowns.  But, under the circumstances, we may be in a situation where the referees are indirectly calling for a review and the replay official, as a result, is taking his best guess rather than looking for indisputable evidence to overturn the call.

Interesting times.

Posted in Chicago Bears, New York Jets | Leave a comment

Quick Comments: Jets at Bears 10/4/26

Posted on October 4, 2026 by Tom Shannon

Offense

  1.  If you are the Jets you make Tyson Bagent beat you.  It looked like they decided to do that by dropping players and playing coverage.  The problem is that apparently left them open in the running game and the Bears took advantage.

  2.  Kudos to the offensive line for doing a good job of protecting Bagent.  Though the Jets didn’t blitz or play any games up front until the end of the first half when the Bears had to pass to get into field goal range, when they final did, the line did as good of a job as you could expect of handling it.  That continued into the second half when the Jets continued to blitz.

  3.  Nice to see Rome Odunze (6 catches for 94 yards) and Colston Loveland (6 catches for 57 yards) finally emerge from hiding today.

  4.  I wasn’t too pleased about the reversal of the touchdown calls in the first quarter.  Neither replay looked conclusive to me.

  5.  Bagent’s interception in the first half was unfortunate.  He threw it to the right guys (Colston Loveland) but he threw it behind him.  It wasn’t the only throw behind the receiver today and he’ll want to clean that up.  It was the first interception for the Jets defense in something like 20 games.

  6.  Having said that, overall a pretty good start for Bagent.  I thought he ran the offense well and I like the fact that he’s not afraid to throw the ball over the middle.

  7.  I thought the Jets were doing a good job of trying to punch the ball out today.  You could tell that they were well coached and turnovers were on their mind.

  8.  The Bears approach to the blitz is instructive.  They don’t do anything ing special.  No short passes and getting it out of the quarterback’s hand.  Instead, they go for the big play.  It puts a lot of pressure on the offensive line and the quarterback is going to see a lot of pressure on those plays.

  9.  The Jets defense just wore downing the fourth quarter. The Bears lead time of possession 43 minutes to 17 and ran 90 plays compared to the Jets 32.

  10.  Did not hear Theo Benedet’s name much today.  Nice job there filling in for Braxton Jones.

 

Defense

  1.  I thought the defense did a good job of tackling today.  Its an under-rated part of the game.

  2.  I thought the Jets went in at half time and decided that they had to run more.  They did it with some success in the first half (5 yards per rush).  The Bears did better in the second half of defending it but I still thought the Jets threw the ball too much.

  3.  Tyrique Stevenson needs to catch that interception at the end of the first half.

  4.  With the exception of the Isaih Williams touchdown, I thought Stevenson did a good job in coverage today.  We’re back to teams avoiding throwing Jaylon Johnson’s way after a couple of games worth of abberations.  Apparently someone thinks he’s finally back in form.

  5.  Nice job of getting the sack from Devin Bush at the beginning of the first half.  The Jets had a decent drive going and were on their way to at least a field goal.  The sack took them out of range.

  6.  The Jets were 0 for 7 on third down today.  Tough to win that way.

 

Miscellaneous 

  1.  Special Teams didn’t have a great day overall.  the game started with a short kickoff that wasn’t fielded and left the Bears in bad field position.  Then there was a punt in the first quarter where Kalif Raymond let a punt bounce for 62 yards (it was called back due to penalty.

  2.  It wasn’t a great day for long snapper Scott Daly.  Some of those special teams snaps were pretty high.

  3.  Wonderful job by Jets punter Austin McNamara with some good long punts today and at least one punt downed at the five from a good 55 yards out.  A guy to keep an eye on.

  4.  You want to know why the Jets were in this game?  Turnovers.  The two Bears turnovers were killers that each yielded points.

  5.  You want to know why the Jets weren’t in this game?  Well, a bunch of reasons.  But the 12 killer, and in some cases stupid, penalties were key.

  6.  This was a good win by the Bears against a team that it would have been very easy to lose to.  The Jets play good defense and don’t turn the ball over.  They’re conservative offensively and coached to not make mistakes (though they did) by a defensive head coach.  Teams like that can be tenacious despite having less talent. 

Posted in Chicago Bears, New York Jets | Leave a comment

Just Accept that Ben Johnson Is Going to Go For It on Fourth Down and Move On

Posted on October 1, 2026 by Tom Shannon

Brad Biggs at the Chicago Tribune answers your questions:

I love Ben Johnson’s aggression but is it going too far? The Bears are passing up points and against stronger opponents that field goal may decide a close game. Is he trusting his offense that much or does his fourth-down approach signal a growing lack of confidence in his defense or special teams units? — @doback4prez

I think all of the analytics would tell you that was a clear green light for the offense when the Bears, leading 7-0 early in the second quarter, went for it on fourth-and-goal from the 3-yard line.

 

That close to the goal line with a chance to go ahead by two touchdowns early in the game, I think you’re going for it most of the time. The only scenario a kick would make more sense in that situation — if we’re removing factors such as weather — is if it’s a chance to go up two scores late in the game.

I doubt Johnson will question his process there. Certainly he’d wish for better execution. Perhaps, in retrospect, he might go with a different play call in the series. But that’s who he is. He’s going to be aggressive and I wasn’t surprised by his go mentality there.

Just a short comment here.  

I think fans often forget that if you don’t get the 3 yards there, you are leaving the opponent deep in their own territory, 97 yard down the field.  This is a big part of the analytics.

Any time you go for it on fourth down, it isn’t just that you are showing confidence in you offense.  It’s confidence in your defense, as well.

Johnson is going to go for it in those situations.  It’s what he does.  If you don’t like it, the only thing I can say is that you have to accept the good with the bad and deal with it.

2 Comments

Game Comments: Bears at Panthers 9/13/26

Posted on September 13, 2026 by Tom Shannon

Offense

  1. Terrible start to the game.  A holding penalty on the first play and a fumble on the third.  Carolina ball on the Bears 40.  Carolina eventually scored a touchdown.
  2. D’Andre Swift just looked great today.  Quick, fast, breaking tackles right and left.  His extension might be money well spent.  THe Bears ran for over 7 yards per rush for over 250 yards total..
  3. You really wonder how the Bears can get away with leaning on a tendency like running to the right that often.  2/3 of the time last year and they certainly look like they’re continuing that again this year.
  4. Caleb Williams still needs to work on that ball placement.  He still struggled on occasion to hit receivers in stride, limiting the RAC.  In many respects it looked like last year.
  5. On the other hand, and this is more important, Williams was getting the ball out on time from the pocket more often than not.
  6. Nice to see Rome Odunze catch an under thrown 50:50 ball.  He’ll need to make a number of those this year if the Bears are going to live up to their potential.  Not to pick on Williams for a complete pass but he threw the ball unnecessarily off of his back foot and didn’t get much behind the throw.  The pass should really have been a touchdown.
  7. What an unbelievable catch by Cole Kmet in the second quarter for a touchdown.  I thought it was a dumb throw coming out of Williams’ hand because I saw good coverage off the line with a safety coming over.  But it was a perfect throw and a wonderful catch.  I can only conclude that Williams saw a matchup he liked and he went for it.
  8. Once Carolina started to blitz in the second quarter they did a pretty good job of stopping the Bears with it. They did do some things to adjust and kudos to Drew Brees, the color man, for pointing them out.  And the Panthers couldn’t stop them consistently (obviously).  But some of those were Williams missing the free rusher off of the edge and he will have to keep an eye out for that.  Vikings defense up next week…

 

Defense

  1. The Bears defense continued the terrible start.  A broken coverage that looked like a bad decision by Jaylon Johnson put the Panthers near the goal line.  
  2. There was some bad tackling out there.   The Bears didn’t look ready to play.
  3. Dillon Thieneman did a solid job today.  I was surprised that the Panthers didn’t do more to attack Cam Lewis at the other safety position, who should have stood out as a weakness in pass coverage.  They finally started to do it a bit late in the third quarter.
  4. Nice throw from Bryce Young for a deep touchdown completion against Tyrique Stevenson in the second quarter.  The Bears corners looked like they started the game a bit too aggressive, biting on what they thought was going to be a short throw to let a receiver get behind them.  Perhaps they were in zone coverage and were depending upon help over the top that didn’t make it over.  But it didn’t look like it.
  5. Usually you can depend upon teams going after Stevenson but the Panthers sure didn’t look like they were afraid to attack Johnson this game.  And they had plenty of success.
  6. What really stuck out to me today was the Bears inability to pressure Young.  The hope was that they’d get more penetration up the middle but it didn’t look to me like we saw much of it.  You wonder if Dennis Allen isn’t going to rely more on the blitz this year again than he would like.  He certainly was stubborn about not relying it todayuntil late in the game.  But I can’t imagine that will last unless things change.
  7. Keep an eye on Caolina’s Jalen Coker.  He looks like he’s got some game.

 

Miscellaneous

  1. Ideal kickoff for Carolina to start the game.  The ball landed in the landing zone and then rolled out of the back of the end zone.  The Bears started at the 20.  It’s something you don’t often see because most of the time the returners catch those balls.
  2. Compare that to the Bears first kickoff which was short of the landing zone.  There was anothe rone in the second half.  That needs to be cleaned up.
  3. It was a loud crowd in Carolina.  I found it to be hard to hear Adam Amin and Drew Brees on occasion.  Kudos to the fans of both teams there.
  4. Lots of slipping and sliding going on out there.  It might have just been fatigue in the heat but it looked like there might have been something odd about the turf.
  5. Fourth and a yard at the Bears 20.  The Bears go for it and don’t make it.  You can’t get mad.  You know that’s who Ben Johnson is.  From his point of view, if you can’t get a fourth and one you don’t belong on the field.
  6. I would have bet money that the Bears would be the team to wear down in the heat this game.  But it sure looked to me like the Panthers were the team that suffered in the fourth quarter.  the bears won the time of possession battle decisively.
  7. We heard over and over again about how a physical camp would prepare the Bears to play in 2026.  There was no evidence of it in some major ways today.  The Panthers enjoyed wonderful starting field position and the Bears shot themselves in the foot with five major penalties and a turnover in the first quarter. They had 12 total penalties over the course of the day.  Repeat after me.  “It’s only week 1.  Its only week 1”.
  8. Tweet of the day during the fourth quarter:

Posted in Carolina Panthers, Chicago Bears | Leave a comment

Xavier Woods Looks Likely to Play Safety Sunday

Posted on September 8, 2026 by Tom Shannon

Brad Biggs at the Chicago Tribune tells us what was learned at Chicago Bears practice Monday:

  1. One thing the Bears have to figure out — if they haven’t already — is who will start alongside [Dillon] Thieneman at safety.

Veterans Xavier Woods and Cam Lewis are the options, and there’s a little bit of a challenge when it comes to communication between Thieneman and whoever gets the job. Both have played a lot of ball, but it’s a time-on-task thing. Woods signed Aug. 7, and Lewis spent a good deal of the spring program and early portion of training camp playing nickel cornerback.

“I feel very comfortable with them,” Thieneman said. “They definitely have a lot of experience to help me. And then I’ve been talking to them a lot in the meeting room, like how they see things, and out in the field we’ll talk once we’re on the sideline.

“But I feel very comfortable and able to communicate and kind of anticipate what the other guys are thinking with both of the guys.”

I’d bet money on Woods.  

Woods is an established NFL starter at safety having played 134 games over nine seasons. His strength is pass defense which makes him at least the safe option in that respect.

Lewis’s strength is special teams. He’s a versatile performer, having played multiple positions across the secondary, including slot cornerback, outside cornerback, and safety. But he hasn’t been a starter at any of those positions.

I don’t know if you acquire a Xavier Woods if you are comfortable with Lewis starting for you.  And, unless he’s shown something with the Bears that he hasn’t shown for anyone else in the last seven years, I don’t know why you’d be comfortable with Lewis.

 

 

Leave a comment

Salvon Ahmed Will Be Ready

Posted on September 6, 2026 by Tom Shannon

Salvon Ahmed.

Salvon Ahmed

Phil Thompson at the Chicago Tribune has 5 observations as Chicago Bears enter Week 1:

4. Will the running back room be ready?

[D’Andre] Swift left Thursday’s practice early, but it’s likely the extent of his injury (if any) won’t become apparent until early in the week.

Kyle Monangai has missed nine consecutive practices since hurting his right knee Aug. 16. He’s “week to week,” so his status on the Bears’ first injury report Wednesday will be critical.

Roschon Johnson had only two carries for 17 yards in seven games last season.

Losing Swift would, indeed, be a blow.  But the Bears prepared for the loss of Monangai when they kept Salvon Ahmed on the practice squad.

Johnson brings special teams expertise and he needed to remain on the roster.  But Ahmed is a six year veteran who will be ready to step in if Monangai can’t go.  Almost everyone agrees that Ahmed outperformed Johnson in the preseason as part of the offense.

Ahmed had six carries for 36 yards, averaging 6.0 yards per attempt. He also contributed significantly in the passing game, notably catching three passes for 55 yards and a 49-yard touchdown in the preseason opener. Though Johnson led the backfield in volume with 35 carries for 128 yards and one touchdown he averaged only 3.7 yards per carry and contributed nothing to the passing game. 

But beyond that, Ahmed simply looked quicker and more dynamic.

The guess here is that if Monangai can’t play, Ahmed will be raised from the practice squad to (the Bears hope) backup Swift and all will be well.

Posted in Chicago Bears | Leave a comment

Bears Defensive Line Could Have the Biggest Impact on the 2026 Season

Posted on September 5, 2026 by Tom Shannon

Brad Biggs at the Chicago Tribune answers your questions:

What are the easiest gains the defense can make despite a lack of big-ticket investments this offseason? Any chance the Gervon Dexter Sr. trade is about getting to a baseline competence on run D so they don’t have so many second- and third-and-shorts? What’s the plan to at least be average on D? — @gregfeltes

Having a healthy No. 1 cornerback is the easiest gain for the Bears defense this season. I’ve alluded to the re-emergence of Jaylon Johnson a couple of times over the past few weeks. He was never 100% or really close to it last season, and he looked a lot closer during training camp to being the top performer he was in 2023 and 2024.

I didn’t think that Biggs addressed the comment about the run defense in his answer.

Its fairly evident that the Bears are looking to penetrate more at the line of scrimmage, especially in the interior of the defensive line. In 2025 the Bears recorded 66 tackles for loss as a team. For context, individual leaders like Myles Garrett (33) and Maxx Crosby (28) accounted for almost half of the Bears aggregate total just as individuals.

This matches what my eyes told me last year.  The Bears were too passive in run defense and struggled hit runningbacks behind the line of scrimmage.  It’s fairly evident that they will want to change that in 2026 by acquiring players who can do a better job of penetrating into the backfield.

If they accomplish this, it should help the defense enormously because, as the question writer points out, they won’t have to deal with as many situations where they have to defend short yardage while simultaneously limiting explosive plays.

Of all of the aspects of team play for the Bears this year outside of quarterback, I think I’m looking forward the most to seeing how the interior of the defensive line plays.  I’m not sure that they have the horses to be difference makers as a group.  But if they do, it will have a very significant impact on the way that the defense plays.  These guys could be the difference between a winning and losing season.

Posted in Chicago Bears | Leave a comment

The Bears Did a Good Job of Maximizing Gervon Dexter’s Trade Value

Posted on September 2, 2026 by Tom Shannon

Gervon Dexter.

Gervon Dexter chicagobears.com

Brad Biggs at the Chicago Tribune on the Bears latest acquisition at cornerback:

Physically, Clark Phillips III projects as a slot cornerback, but the majority of his experience in Atlanta the last three seasons came on the outside.

He was competing to be the Falcons nickel back in 2025, but a triceps injury wound up limiting him to one game. The Bears acquired the 5-foot-9, 185-pounder and a fifth-round pick Sunday for defensive tackle Gervon Dexter Sr.

Phillips played in 27 games in his first two seasons with the Falcons, getting 821 snaps. We’ll have to see what the coaches say about how he’ll be used.

“I liked him coming out of Utah in 2023 as a nickel,” one pro scout said. “Kind of twitchy and he played downhill with some juice. Willing tackler and competed and had decent speed. He struggled to stay connected downfield, though, and that’s where his length — his arms are less than 30 inches — showed up.”

I loved this trade by the Bears.  Dexter has done next to nothing in the NFL after the Bears took him in the second round of the 2023 NFL draft as a barely servicable rotation player.  

Ian Cunningham, the current Falcons GM obviously liked Dexter when he was assistant GM with the Bears. So the Bears found the one team in the NFL that might have given them a 5th round pick for Dexter, let alone a player to go along with it.

If Clark Phillips contributes any depth at all at slot cornerback this year, I’d say the Bears got a steal.

Leave a comment

The Bears Get Tough With High Risk Decisions at Defensive Tackle

Posted on September 2, 2026 by Tom Shannon

Jayden loving.

Jayden Loving from chicagobears.com

Brad Biggs at the Chicago Tribune empties his notebook.   He notes the surprises that have emerged at defensive tackle over the summer:

[Jayden] Loving, who spent two seasons at Bethune-Cookman, two at Western Kentucky and finished his college career at Wake Forest last fall, was one of 10 defensive linemen on the initial 53-man roster and the fifth defensive tackle.

He played his way onto the roster with four tackles, one sack and two pass deflections in the preseason. The hope is he can develop into an explosive force on the interior.

 

Loving had 2½ sacks last season for the Demon Deacons. How he fits into the puzzle at the bottom of the depth chart will be interesting, but it’s clear the Bears see developmental potential at a position that’s likely to have some turnover next offseason.

He primarily played nose tackle and five-technique at Wake Forest and believes he can do whatever he’s asked in the team’s front.

Jordan van den Berg, who has been a more high profile development, had 3 sacks at Georgia Tech and lasted until the sixth round for the Bears to take him in the draft. However, he did have 11 tackles for loss.

I’m both nervous and excited about what the Bears are doing at defensive tackle this year.  Neither of these players was high on anyone’s radar going into the draft and neither had spectacular years in college.  The Bears are taking a risk in depending upon their ability to develop players that haven’t shown a lot to this point at other, lower profile stops.

Like the Bears, I like what I’ve seen from these players, especially van den Berg, in preseason games against backups.  Presumably both performed well in competitive practices against the Bengals and the Titans.

That’s good because the Bears are presumably going to depend a lot on generating pressure on the quarterback up the middle this year.  This could offset presumed deficiencies in the pass rush from the outside.

Its goingo the be an interesting year once again for the Bears defense as they once again attempt to overcome adversity in the form of injuries by relying upon the coaching staff to adapt and extract performances from what they have been given.  Its going to require mental toughness from everyone involved.  I can’t wait to see it.

Posted in Chicago Bears | Leave a comment