Is Cornerback a “Want” or a “Need” in the NFL Draft?

Tyrique_Stevenson-2.jpg

Brad Biggs at the Chicago Tribune answers your questions:

What do you think is the Bears’ biggest need outside of safety, edge and defensive tackle? — @oltmannsean

A couple of ideas pop into my mind. First, after those three positions, we’re starting to creep into what I would describe as “wants” more than “needs.” It sure looks like the Bears want to add a center they can bring along behind Garrett Bradbury. I would put cornerback in the want category and include wide receiver, linebacker, tight end and maybe running back. It will depend on how they feel about the players on the board. I think they’ll remain true to their grades or close to it.

It will also depend on how they feel about the players that they currently have on the roster. At cornerback, I’m not sure how comfortable they should be.

Jaylon Johnson **is a guy they are, of course, happy with on one side. And given the $13 million per year average that the Bears are giving him, they’d better be comfortable with **Kyler Gordon in the slot. But I’m not so sure about the other outside cornerback.

Do the Bears really want to go into the 2026 season with one of Zah Frazier, Jaylon Jones, Terell Smith, and Tyrique Stevenson as your starter at this position?

Whether this is a “want” or a “need” depends on your answer to the question, “Are these players that you can ‘get by with’”? Based upon what I’ve seen in the past from all of them except Frazier, who missed his rookie season for “personal reasons”, my answer is “no”. At one point, I was comfortable with Stevenson. But he has underperformed, ranking a well below average 52nd out of 114 qualifying cornerbacks in 2025 according to PFF.

None of these players shows the consistency to make me comfortable with them as a starting NFL cornerback. And that makes cornerback another need, not a want, in this year’s draft.

Posted in Chicago Bears | Leave a comment

The Bears Must Now Improve Their Roster the Same Way that Other Good Teams Do

Darnell_Wright_(cropped)-2.jpg

Brad Biggs at the Chicago Tribune answers your questions:

How in the world are the Bears going to create needed pass rush with the players they have and a non-top draft pick? That’s even if they take a defensive end in the first round. — @kunistodd

Fair question and one that can lead us down a number of alleys because there are many layers to this.

The timing of the NFL offseason — free agency comes before the draft — and the fact the Bears have regularly taken big swings in free agency for a long time have obscured the reality that the draft should be the biggest part of the offseason. Smart teams find ways to get better in free agency, and sometimes that means investing in their own players to prevent them from eventually departing as free agents. That’s one way of saying when the Bears get around to signing right tackle Darnell Wright to an extension — and I’m not sure when that will happen — you should consider that expenditure in a different light.

I thought the Bears had really good synergy between the front office and coaching staff last year in terms of draft and development and finding free agents who were good fits for the scheme. If we can agree on that, then general manager Ryan Poles, coach Ben Johnson and defensive coordinator Dennis Allen probably have earned some benefit of the doubt. Now, it will be more challenging this time as they had the 10th pick and three second-round picks a year ago, but no NFL team will take the field in Week 1 with the depth chart it has right now. There’s opportunity for the Bears to get better, and this is considered a deep draft for edge rushers.

Bears fans are going to have to adjust their attitudes when it comes to the desire to immediately fill holes on the teams’ roster. They aren’t in the position to just throw money at their problems anymore. And, without rehashing articles dating back to time immemorial, I’ll just say that’s a good thing because it almost never works and I’ll leave it at that.

The Bears are at a critical point where they are in balance. They can fall way and continue to build on their performance last year and get better. Or they can fall back to below average and pick in the top ten again next year.

If they can do the former then they, and their fans, are going to have to get used to their new reality. They are going to have to look to teams like the Packers and Steelers. These are just two of the organizations that, though they don’t make the playoffs and win the Super Bowl every year, have consistently competed at a high level for a very long time. They don’t ever have high, top ten picks. They don’t have the cap space of the cash to sign big name free agent. But they maximize their resources by drafting wherever they land and developing their players from there.

My advice to Bears fans is to hope that there are always questions, other than quarterback, going into training camp for years to come. If that is the case, it will mean that the front office and the coaching staff have managed to develop talent the ay that good teams do more often than not.

Posted in Chicago Bears | Leave a comment

Replacing Andrew Billings Presence Will Be a Problem

Andrew-Billings.jpg
Sean Hammond and Phil Thompson at the Chicago Tribune note that new Bears defensive tackle Neville Gallimore wanted to be a quarterback when growing up:

“See that’s the thing, that arm — that arm wasn’t cutting it,” Gallimore laughed. “When I watched David Garrard, (he was) a dominant player. (He) was one of the bigger quarterbacks who could run. So I thought, ‘Hey, man, that could have been me.’ I could run.

“That arm, though. That arm wasn’t where it needed to be. So I was like, ‘I’m just going to stay on the line.’”

That’s where Gallimore made an impact for the Indianapolis Colts last season, recording career highs of 3½ sacks, 13 quarterback pressures and 38 tackles.

The Bears let Andrew Billings sign with the Arizona Cardinals and inked Gallimore to a two-year, $12 million contract. That marks a notable change in approach. At 6-1, 340, Billings was a space-eating bulldozer. Gallimore signals a willingness to get more athletic in the trenches. His mentality, going back to when he was emulating Garrard as a kid, is all about athleticism.

Fair enough. The article emphasizes that the Bears got faster during free agency and Gallimore will undoubtedly contribute to that.

You don’t have to be a huge mountain of a man to stop the run. But I can say that when Billings was unavailable due to injury, the Bears’ ability to do that suffered greatly.

According to play-by-play data from the NFL, analyzed via nflfastR, in 2024 during the first half of the season with Billings, the Bears allowed 3.6 yards per carry up the middle with a success rate of 38% and an EPA per play of -0.3166 (favoring the defense). After Billings suffered a torn pectoral muscle against the Cardinals in week 9, those numbers increased to 4.3 yards per carry with a 62% success rate and a 0.1975 EPA per play (favoring the offense). That’s a huge swing.

Though Billings’ impact is harder to evaluate from 2025 when he was available all year, it is evident that Billings has had a huge impact on the run game that is going to be difficult to replace.

It all starts up front in the NFL. That’s where games are won and lost. The challenge now for the defensive line, both new free agent signings and draft picks, will be to penetrate and disrupt in a way that will replace Billings’ impact on the run game. If they do that, the Bears will be better. If, like the current players, they don’t, it’s going to be a long year defensively in 2026.

Posted in Chicago Bears | Leave a comment

This Is One of the Stupidest Things I’ve Ever Seen

Ryan Poles.jpg

Via Mike Florio at profootballtalk.com:

Former NFL linebacker Darron Lee appeared in court on Monday for a preliminary hearing on charges of first-degree murder and tampering with evidence. And the case against him includes some unusual, and particularly incriminating, evidence.

Via Local 3 News, the prosecution offered testimony indicating that Lee had consulted ChatGPT on how to deal with a person who is unresponsive. The message came from Lee’s phone.

Lee also asked ChatGPT about the injuries that would be consistent with someone falling in the shower.

Body camera footage showed Lee telling a police officer that the victim, 29-year-old Gabriella Perpetuo, may have slipped and fallen in the shower but that Lee didn’t know what had happened to her. The police report in the case indicates that blood was found through the house, along with broken glass.

Authorities also said that Perpetuo had “multiple stab wounds, black eyes, bite marks, and blood coming from her nose and mouth.”

I don’t have a comment here. I just thought it would be nice to be reminded that no matter what you do, there are still people in the world who are stupider than you are.

Posted in Chicago Bears | Leave a comment

The Bears Conservative Approach to Free Agency Is the Right One

Ryan Poles.jpg

Phil Thompson at the Chicago Tribune on the Bears conservative approach to free agency:

[GM Ryan] Poles is taking the long view, not serving a short-term bid for a Super Bowl run that might not materialize next season. And then a season or two later, you’re in salary-cap hell with a roster of aging or injury-riddled stars.

The champion Seattle Seahawks were a model of building steadily but fairly quickly, with hardly a household name among their number.

Poles acknowledged he has to consider: “What’s going to help this football team now? But also being conscious of what’s going to happen down the road.”

“We want to sustain success,” he continued. “We talk about that a lot. In order to do that, we have to be very calculated with the moves we make. We felt like sticking with our plan going into free agency, that was the best thing for us.”

For years, Bears fans clamored for the team to be big players in free agency. And I’d say over the last 10 years that they have been with some big signings and big trades. And look where it’s got them. Not very far. Lots of big swings. Some hits. A lot of misses. I’m looking at you, Chase Claypool.

These largely expensive moves that have drained their resources have generally gotten them nowhere for very long.

Good franchises that are competitive year after year in the long term generally don’t operate that way. I look at teams like the Steelers, for instance, and I don’t see them out there chasing expensive free agents. These are draft and develop organizations that are very strategic in their free agent signings.

The Bears had that in the Jerry AngeloLovie Smith days of the franchise, and though they weren’t competing for a Super Bowl every year, they competed within the division more often than not.

Now the Bears appear to me to be set up better than they were in the Angelo days because they appear to me to have a better coaching staff with an offensive head coach that can compare favorably with anyone in the league.

The Bears are truly set up for sustained success. Now is not the time to go all in. The Bears need to be about value now.

It’s the time to get the best deal you can for under-the-radar talent and to let the organization make that talent worth more than what you paid for. That’s what good organizations do, and that’s what the team has to become.

Posted in Chicago Bears | 2 Comments

Sometimes Good Teams Have to Make More Out of What The Have

Braxton Jones Similing.jpg

Brad Biggs at the Chicago Tribune on the left tackle situation headed into the draft:

It’s not unlike the spot the franchise found itself in last offseason, sorting through a handful of options to play the position. There’s an injured player in the mix again, this time Ozzy Trapilo, who will miss at least a good chunk of the season as he recovers from a torn patellar tendon in his left knee. The Bears probably need to prepare for the possibility that Trapilo, a second-round pick in 2025, won’t be in the mix until 2027.

The difference this time around is the coaching staff has two experienced players to evaluate: Braxton Jones, who signed his one-year contract Friday, and Jedrick Wills Jr., a first-round pick (No. 10) of the Cleveland Browns in 2020.

Add Theo Benedet — who made eight starts last season, including seven at left tackle — and even Kiran Amegadjie into the mix and it’s unlikely the Bears will look at a left tackle with their first-round draft pick next month.

I think that what these moves tell me more than anything is that they don’t anticipate that a potential left tackle will be the best player on the board when the time comes for their pick. It also suggests to me that they don’t see the possibility of trading up for one.

As I talk to fans in the neighborhood and around the Internet, I hear a lot of hand-wringing over the state of the left tackle position. “Surely, they aren’t planning to go into the season with these guys! Surely they aren’t done!” After asking them not to call me Shirley, I try to point out to them that they very well might be done.

How many people reading this post thought going into last season that Nashon Wright would be tied for second in the NFL in interceptions with five? How many thought that Kevin Byard was going to be a first-team All-Pro?

Fans always want to see all pros at every position, and I do, too. But sometimes you can’t just buy those guys off the shelf. Sometimes you have to make them. And the more that time goes on and the more you have to pay players like Caleb Williams, the more of them you have to make.

That’s what good teams do.

I would describe Jones as “serviceable” when healthy. About league average, give or take five spots. Most would describe Wills as, perhaps, even a bit better.

Can the Bears make them better than that? Perhaps with good coaching they can. But even if they can’t, good coaches like Ben Johnson can make “serviceable” work. They have to. That’s their job. Because you can’t have a top-paid NFL player at every position.

Sometimes good teams have to work with what they have.

Posted in Chicago Bears | Leave a comment

Will Kyler Murray Really Be the Answer in Minnesota?

Dave Campbell writing for the Chicago Tribune on the Vikings acquisition of quarterback Kyler Murray after he was cut by the Cardinals:

Murray, despite being sidetracked by recent injuries and dogged by questions about his work ethic, has two Pro Bowl selections, a 67% career completion percentage — and a bonus of 3,193 rushing yards with 32 touchdowns.

After winning the Heisman Trophy at Oklahoma, Murray was voted the NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year and appeared to have the Cardinals on the upswing. He produced multiple electrifying highlights such as the “Hail Murray” in 2020, when he connected with DeAndre Hopkins for a game-winning touchdown pass against the Buffalo Bills on the game’s final play. Murray passed for 400 yards in a Week 2 win over the Vikings in 2021, when the Cardinals started 10-2 before finishing 11-6.

The Cardinals signed Murray to five-year, $230.5 million contract in 2022 with $160 million guaranteed, but the honeymoon after that hefty commitment was short. A few weeks after the deal was done, the Cardinals removed a strange clause in the contract that mandated four hours of “independent study” during game weeks. The kerfuffle called into question Murray’s work habits, and his relationship with the franchise was never the same.

My impression of Murray is that he’s been incredibly inconsistent his whole career. Although it’s hard to know from the outside looking in, it’s not hard to conclude that this stems from poor work habits. Anyone who threw anything at Murray that he didn’t expect likely had success against him.

There’s no denying Murray’s talent, and I think that Minnesota head coach Kevin O’Connell is a pretty good quarterback coach. It’s entirely possible that Murray will experience a renaissance under him and have a good year. But long term, Murray is unlikely to be the answer for any team as long as computer games supersede the kind of dedication to the game that seems to be required for most successful NFL quarterbacks.

I have serious doubts that the Vikings have solved their quarterback problem.

Posted in Chicago Bears | Leave a comment

The D.J. Moore Trade was no Surprise. But the Compensation Was.

Brad Biggs at the Chicago Tribune on which trade or signing surprised him during the free agent portion of the offseason:

None of the moves really came across as surprising. It was eye-opening the Bears got a second-round pick from the Buffalo Bills for [D.J.] Moore and a fifth-round pick. As openly as the Bears discussed the possibility of trading Moore, it became pretty evident they were telling everyone, “Come make us an offer.” The Bears liked Moore, but they needed the cap space the move created. Given they were so open about trading him, getting a second-rounder back was impressive even if they had to ship a fifth to Buffalo. Maybe the Bills feared Ryan Poles could put together a deal with the division rival Patriots, who also needed receivers.

I, too, was surprised by this. But my gut feeling was that in order to get such a good deal, the Bears would have to eat some of Moore’s $23.5 million base salary. Which would, of course, defeat the purpose of the trade.

It looked to me like Bears head coach Ben Johnson never really knew what to do with Moore. He’s not particularly big and he’s not particularly fast, and he wasn’t a particularly good fit for anything that Johnson wanted to do. Moore probably would have been OK as a #3 receiver in Johnson’s offense, but he was being paid to be a good #1 receiver. That’s why Johnson was doing things like putting Moore into the backfield as a running back in order to maximize his value. It was an awkward situation.

Bills head coach Joe Brady was the offensive coordinator for the Carolina Panthers in 2020–2021 when Moore was a starting wide receiver for the team. Brady might very well have a better idea of how to use Moore to maximize his production.

Still, you have to wonder who the Bills were bidding against at that salary for Moore.

So, yes, the compensation that the Bears received was a surprise. Nevertheless, this looks like it could be a trade that could work out well for both sides.

Posted in Chicago Bears | Leave a comment

New Coaches and Old Friends

Brad Biggs at the Chicago Tribune goes over changes to the Bears staff for the 2026 season.

Press Taylor will be offensive coordinator after spending last year as the passing game coordinator. Eric Studesville has been named running backs coach. He spent nine seasons with the Miami Dolphins, overlapping there for two years with Ben Johnson. Will Lawing, who was teammates with Johnson at North Carolina, will be an offensive analyst. Isaiah Ford was hired as an offensive quality control assistant. Ford was drafted as a wide receiver by the Dolphins in 2017. Johnson was a Miami wide receivers coach in 2017 and 2018..

Its not a big deal, especially this year when two of the assistants (Lawing and Ford) are low on the coaching pathway, but is always bothers me when new staff additions all have previous connections to the head coach.

I get it. These are people you know and are comfortable with. But it always makes you wonder if the best people for the job are being hired. You’d like to eventually see Johnson branch out to find new blood. Otherwise, the quality coaching staff will eventually degrade.

Admittedly, in the meantime, Johnson is the most important member of the staff and it’s entirely possible that he, as head coach will be driving them to a better than average quality.

Posted in Chicago Bears | Leave a comment

The Bears Can’t Rest With the Idea that They Have a Good Defensive Line When Healthy

Brad Biggs at the Chicago Tribune addresses what the Super Bowl can teach the Bears. He highlights needs along the defensive line:

While it’s true that general manager Ryan Poles needs to address the defensive line beginning next month, it’s not like he didn’t make an effort last year. The Bears signed tackle Grady Jarrett and end Dayo Odeyingbo in free agency. They just didn’t provide the kind of high-level play the Bears got from the interior linemen they added on the offensive side. Jarrett battled through a right knee injury, and Odeyingbo suffered a torn Achilles tendon. Rookie end Shemar Turner, a second-round pick, was lost to a torn ACL.

Even with all three healthy, the Bears need some combination of upgrades and competition to elevate the profile of [defensive coordinator, Dennis] Allen’s defense. The timing is right because it’s a solid draft for defensive linemen.

There is a danger here for the Bears. With limited resources they might think that they fixed the defensive line last year and that injuries simply derailed the plan. But injuries are a part of the game and all that tells me is that they didn’t have enough depth.

Odeyingbo was a disappointment even when he was on the field. Turner, a second round pick from the 2025 draft, is still a mystery but the Bears haven’t had a good record of drafting defensive linemen in recent years. Gervon Dexter, drafted by Poles in the second round in 2023, hasn’t set the world on fire and Zach Pickens, drafted in the third round the same year, isn’t even on the team. Austin Booker, drafted in the fifth round in 2025, had a good year but it looked to me like he was schemed into the sacks he got with too many free runs at the quarterback. He hasn’t shown me the ability to beat an offensive lineman one-on-one with any consistency and that’s what the Bears need a lot more of.

With no cap space to spare this offseason, the Bears have to draft better or they’ll struggle to remain competitive with a tougher schedule and a considerably bigger challenge coming up next year.

Posted in Chicago Bears | Leave a comment